> Ryan Delaney <ryan.dela...@gmail.com> writes: > > Why couldn't an RDBMS such as postgres interpret a SELECT that omits the > > GROUP > > BY as implicitly grouping by all the columns that aren't part of an > > aggregate?
I'm Mr. Curious today ... Why would you think that such a thing is necessary or desirable? Simply add the columns to the GROUP BY clause and make the request unambiguous. -- Bill Moran -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
