Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Andrey Lizenko <lizenk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. They are not WAL-logged.
>> Whats wrong with it in my case?
> Nothing. Temporary tables are not WAL-logged, but transaction commit is.
Right. I think there is some optimization for transactions that only
wrote temp-table data, but it could at most be skipping fsync of the
transaction commit record, not omitting generating it entirely.
Also, changes to the system catalogs are always WAL-logged; so creation
and deletion of a temp table cause some amount of WAL output, even if
manipulation of the table's contents does not.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
