On 17/09/2014 6:04 PM, John R Pierce [via PostgreSQL] wrote: > On 9/17/2014 2:50 PM, cowwoc wrote: > > I think it would be much more productive to fix the deployment problem > > (instead of throwing more documentation at it). If the extension came > > bundled with Postgresql and was as easy to install as "CREATE > > EXTENSION pljava" then we wouldn't be having this discussion. > > I believe a major issue is the JNI interface... even on a specific > platform like RHEL6 there can be any of a rather wide range of different > java's installed, openjdk 1.6, openjdk 1.7, or any of various Sun Java > SE or EE builds, or even (ARRRGH) GCJ...... the JNI components need to > be linked to a specific one of these to function properly.
Hi John, Can you be more specific? Are you talking about load-time linking against jvm.dll/so? Gili -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Why-isn-t-Java-support-part-of-Postgresql-core-tp5819025p5819413.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
