Arnaud Lesauvage <arnaud.lis...@codata.eu> writes:
> Le 1/09/2014 17:39, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> Not necessarily. \d will match any character that iswdigit() returns true
>> for. It looks like your new server is using a locale that considers "²"
>> to be a digit.
> Since both PostgreSQL servers run on the same computer, can I assume
> that this is a collation problem ?
Ah: after consulting the commit history I realized that the regex
operators only base \d on iswdigit() in 9.2 and later. Before that
it was hardwired as [0-9]. So there might not be any difference
in the locale environment after all.
I wonder whether this was a bad idea. I think it's unsurprising for the
definition of "alphanumeric" to depend on locale, but I bet most people
are not expecting \d to vary that way.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
