Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It's not just that it's "not high on anyone's priority list", it's that
>> we'd want to be sure that the patch didn't break any existing use-cases
>> or make things unmaintainable. (This isn't exactly a negligible concern
>> considering that Postgres thinks #! is a legal operator name.)
> I think the operator objection is specious -- ISTM there is no
> scenario where an operator could be legally parsed without seeing a
> keyword first.
[ pokes at it... ] Yeah, perhaps so. I had been thinking that it might
be possible for a SQL command to be continued across files, but the way
psql's MainLoop works, that's not the case. If you do something like
SELECT 42
\i foo
;
whatever is read from foo is sent to the backend separately, it's not
folded into the outer file's SELECT. So this may be a non-problem,
at least till such time as somebody wishes they could change that.
> OTOH (recalling the BOM discussion), the situation with stdin is
> hopeless -- only psql -f or \i could strip out the shebang.
Right, but the use-case for this is (I suppose)
#! /path/to/psql -f
which according to the shell docs I'm looking at will result in
"./foo.sql other-args" turning into
/path/to/psql -f ./foo.sql other-args
So it seems like it could work, and the complaint about needing additional
connection parameters isn't that strong either.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
