On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:36 AM, AI Rumman <rumman...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I see lots of similar log message at a certain time in a day on Postgresql >> 9,.1: >> >> LOG: process 18855 still waiting for ShareLock on transaction 2856146023 >> after 1001.209 ms >> STATEMENT: UPDATE table1 SET time = $1 WHERE id = $2 >> >> The table1 size is 17 G. >> >> What could be the reason for this lock contention? >> autovacuum? > > This may be a CREATE INDEX query taking some time, perhaps combined with an > old prepared transaction still holding a lock? Perhaps a cron job running > behind that you are not aware of?
Wouldn't that be waiting on the table, not the transaction? I think transaction lock waits are (almost?) always due to tuples, so "FOR UPDATE", UPDATE, etc. > You should have a look at pg_stat_activity, pg_prepared_xacts and pg_locks > to get more information about the transactions running and the locks being > taken. In 9.4, the log message will also include info on the blocking process, not just the blocked process, for lock waits. But until then, pg_stat_activity and pg_locks are the best bet. Unless you can afford to turn log_statement to 'all' and dig through the resulting mess. Cheers, Jeff -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
