On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> wrote:
> I don't think the suggestion is to move to async command processing. I > think the suggestion is to use those methods to make a > PGgetResultWithTimeout() that does what you want. > > Have a nice day, > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <klep...@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > > He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he > does > > not attach much importance to his own thoughts. > -- Arthur Schopenhauer > > Yeah, that will work. Looks simple to implement in the client. Question is: why don't you think it should be a part of the libpq's API? It's a must have feature in high availability environments where only several minutes of Out of Service per year are tolerable. I am not sure if it is the right mailing list to ask, but - would a patch with the function be considered?
