On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Elanchezhiyan Elango <elanela...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Missed to answer this one: > >> Is the 5GB for the table plus indexes, or just the table itself? > > No it's not including the the indices. Including indices it's actually > 17GB!! > Is it one particular index that is bloated? Cheers, Jeff
