James Harper <james.har...@bendigoit.com.au> writes:
> I have created a custom type called my_numeric, which is roughly the same as
> the existing numeric type. I have declared in, out, typmod_in, and typmod_out
> functions. I create a table like:
> CREATE TABLE test (col1 my_numeric(6, 3));
> And then do \d test and can see that col1 is declared as (6, 3), which I
> think confirms that my typmod_in and typmod_out function are correct.
> But when I do:
> INSERT INTO test VALUES ('12.34');
> It behaves as though the typmod parameter to my in function
> (PG_GETARG_INT32(2)) is passed in as -1.
It might be. In at least some cases the parser will generate a value as
unconstrained my_numeric and then expect to be able to cast that to the
constrained subtype. Whether that's the case here or not, in general you
will need a length-coercion cast function to support a type like this.
IIRC, you can read about that in the CREATE CAST documentation.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
