I've been plagued several times by NOT DEFERRABLE constraints. Is there any good reason to define a constraint as NOT DEFERRABLE rather than DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE? For example, is there performance penalty for PostgreSQL being prepared to defer a constraint even though it is not currently being deferred?
The only downside I see to DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE is that a naive user could needless set it to deferred, and thus use more memory/time than they otherwise would. But there are so many ways for naive users to shoot themselves in the foot, I fail to see the point in foreclosing this one possibility. Cheers, Jeff
