Ken Tanzer <ken.tan...@gmail.com> writes:
> When I look the output of pg_config, and especially compared to my 9.2
> output, it seems suspiciously lacking some 9.3 paths:

> [root@new-agency table_log-0.4.4]# pg_config | more
> BINDIR = /usr/bin
> DOCDIR = /usr/share/doc/pgsql
> HTMLDIR = /usr/share/doc/pgsql
> INCLUDEDIR = /usr/include
> PKGINCLUDEDIR = /usr/include
> INCLUDEDIR-SERVER = /usr/include/server
> LIBDIR = /usr/lib
> PKGLIBDIR = /usr/lib
> LOCALEDIR = /usr/share/locale
> MANDIR = /usr/share/man
> SHAREDIR = /usr/share
> SYSCONFDIR = /etc/sysconfig/pgsql

Exactly where is root's path finding pg_config?

IIRC, most of the paths shown here are actually computed relative to the
location of the pg_config executable, so I could imagine getting this
kind of result if you'd done something like symlinking pg_config into
/usr/bin.

I would've guessed that you were invoking a pg_config shipped with the
regular Red Hat postgres packages, except for this:

> CONFIGURE = '--disable-rpath' '--prefix=/usr/pgsql-9.3'
> '--includedir=/usr/pgsql-9.3/include' '--mandir=/
> usr/pgsql-9.3/share/man' '--datadir=/usr/pgsql-9.3/share' '--with-perl'

which seems to prove that the package was built with the correct
options for PGDG's file placement.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to