On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Achilleas Mantzios < ach...@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:
> http://www.unix-experience.fr/2013/2451/ > > FreeBSD is also a very mature platform for ZFS/postgresql. > It is more mature than Linux for sure, but still not up to par with Solaris for some features. See this comment for example: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27269032-. I do like FreeBSD very much, but it seems to me that if I want to use ZFS to its fullest, I should go with OpenIndiana. In the benchmark you link, ZFS+opti (orange line, physical machine benchmark) performs well because it has sync=disabled, which is risky to say the least ... > > > On 16/01/2014 11:57, Sébastien Lorion wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Sébastien Lorion < > s...@thestrangefactory.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Since ZFS on Linux (http://zfsonlinux.org/) has been declared >> production ready last March (v0.6.1), I am curious if anyone is using it >> with PostgreSQL on production servers (either main or backup) and if so, >> what is their experience so far ? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Sébastien >> > > FYI, a recent (Sept. 2013) presentation I found about using ZoL in > production (albeit, not with PostgreSQL) and the current status of the > project: > > http://lanyrd.com/2013/linuxcon-north-america/scqmfb/ > > > > -- > Achilleas Mantzios > Head of IT DEV > IT DEPT > Dynacom Tankers Mgmt > >
