Hi,

Once I faced the same problem of adding new type and reqriting the query
working with crosstab function. Then I created a dynamic crosstab function.
You may have a look at it if it work out for you:
http://www.rummandba.com/2013/03/postgresql-dynamic-crosstab-function.html

Thanks.


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Ken Tanzer <ken.tan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi.  I've got a simple table unit_hold, with grant numbers, buildings and
> counts of unit types, which I need to summarize, along with a table listing
> unit types:
>
> \d unit_hold
>                  Table "public.unit_hold"
>         Column        |         Type          | Modifiers
> ----------------------+-----------------------+-----------
>  grant_number_code    | character varying(10) |
>  housing_project_code | character varying(10) |
>  unit_type_code       | character varying(10) |
>  count                | bigint                |
>
> SELECT * FROM unit_hold limit 3;
>  grant_number_code | housing_project_code | unit_type_code | count
> -------------------+----------------------+----------------+-------
>  1                 | AAAA                 | 4BR            |     1
>  1                 | BBBB                 | 1BR            |     1
>  1                 | CCCC                 | 1BR            |     1
>
> SELECT unit_type_code,description FROM l_unit_type;
>  unit_type_code | description
> ----------------+-------------
>  5BR            | 5 Bedroom
>  4BR            | 4 Bedroom
>  3BR            | 3 Bedroom
>  6BR            | 6 Bedroom
>  UNKNOWN        | Unknown
>  GROUP          | Group Home
>  2BR            | 2 Bedroom
>  1BR            | 1 Bedroom
>  0BR            | Studio
>  SRO            | SRO
>
>
> I thought this would be a good candidate for crosstab.  After wrestling
> with the documentation, this is the best I could come up with:
>
> SELECT * FROM crosstab(
>   'SELECT housing_project_code||''_''||grant_number_code AS
> project_and_grant,grant_number_code,housing_project_code,unit_type_code,count
> FROM unit_hold ORDER BY 1,2',
>   'SELECT * FROM (SELECT DISTINCT unit_type_code FROM l_unit_type) foo
> ORDER BY unit_type_code ~ ''^[0-9]'' DESC, unit_type_code'
> ) AS ct(project_and_grant varchar, grant_number_code varchar,
> housing_project_code varchar, "0BR" bigint, "1BR" bigint, "2BR" bigint,
> "3BR" bigint, "4BR" bigint, "5BR" bigint, "6BR" bigint,"GROUP" bigint,
> "SRO" bigint, "UNKNOWN" bigint)
>
> So here are my questions:
>
> 1)  Is there a simpler way?  I'm hoping I made this unnecessarily
> cumbersome and complicated.
> 2)  AFAICT, if a new unit type were to be added, I'd have to rewrite this
> query.  Is there any way to avoid that?
> 3)  It seems like everything after the first query, except for the
> category field, is redundant information, and that in theory you should be
> able to say crosstab('query','category_field').  Is there any inherent
> reason this simpler form couldn't work, or is it just that no one has
> wanted to do it, or gotten to it yet?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ken
>
>
> --
> AGENCY Software
> A data system that puts you in control
> 100% Free Software
> *http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
> ken.tan...@agency-software.org<https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&to=ken.tan...@agency-software.org>
> (253) 245-3801
>
> Subscribe to the mailing 
> list<https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&to=agency-general-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net&body=subscribe>
>  to
> learn more about AGENCY or
> follow the discussion.
>

Reply via email to