Yeah, the things that matters are always on top of the changelog, so it's not much trouble to look after then.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 11/07/2013 11:07 AM, Greg Burek wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Leonardo Carneiro >> <chesterma...@gmail.com <mailto:chesterma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I don't think that there will be too much trouble, as long as you >> follow every changelog tip (9.0->9.1, 9.1->9.2 and 9.2->9.3) >> >> >> What if we don't follow the changelog tip? In this case, we have only >> the 9.0 and 9.3 binaries installed and pg_upgrade directly to 9.3. Does >> that cause fear? >> > > Not so much fear as concern. One of my rules is that the good will take > care of itself it is the bad you have to plan for. In this case it is not > the nine changes that do not impact your code but the one that does. When > going through the change logs the incompatibilities are listed at the top > under the Migration to Version 9.* header. It does not take to long to > double check. If you want to save time just look at the major version > changes, i.e 9.X versus 9.X.x as incompatibilities are allowed in major > version changes. Not that they do not happen in minor releases, but that is > generally done to fix a security/major bug and I do not recall any in the > range you are looking at. > > -- > Adrian Klaver > adrian.kla...@gmail.com > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >
