On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote: >> Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ? > > Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type > that's the road you have to go.
I see. Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement the above that's linked to in the blog post ? Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
