Yeah, I already set it like that and it works. Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:59 AM, bricklen <brick...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:23 AM, AI Rumman <rumman...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am going to sync slave with my master which is almost 500 G. I am not >> using archive directory instead of I am using wal files for streaming. As >> it may take almost 3 hours, I am thinking of setting up 400 for >> wal_keep_segments where I have enough space available. >> >> Without the space issue, could there be any other problem in setting up >> such high value for "wal_keep_segments"? As this is production, I need to >> confirmed. >> > > Another data point: I set up SR on two systems recently in production with > the wal_keep_segments set to 10000 (lots of logs were being generated), and > the slaves were about 1TB each. No problems were experienced. > >
