On Jul 28, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Amit Langote wrote: > I think, the WAL recycling on standby names the recycled segments with > the latest timelineID (in this case it's 0x10) which creates WALs that > there shouldn't have been like 000000100000146A00000001 instead of > 0000000F0000146A00000001. This patch recently applied to 9.1.9 (but > not in any stable release so far) solves this problem as far as I can > see. Try and see if you can patch it: > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=424cc31a3785bd01108e6f4b20941c6442d3d2d0
Thanks for the link Amit. That makes for 2 patches we're eagerly awaiting in 9.1.10.
