On 18/05/13 03:06, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2013-05-16 18:35, David Kerr wrote:
- I'll take a look tomorrow, but we WERE seeing Seq Scan's against
- multi-million
- row tables, so I suspect Tom is right on with the replanning that's in
- 9.2 fixing
- it, and I'm in the process of validating that.
That seems likely, although you could try enable_seqscan=false as well.
Dave
The 9.2 upgrade DOES fix my issue.
Thanks again, Tom and everyone.
Did you also */enable_seqscan=false as well/*?
Cheers,
Gavin
