As usual, you are totally right Tom.

But thanks everybody for the debate.  Only I have to add, is near a "must"
to run with --check before actually run the command.



2013/5/16 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>

> Fabio Rueda Carrascosa <avances...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Hello, I have a 9.1 cluster with 50 databases, only one table per db with
> > 2000 rows only, but a lot of schema around each one (postgis databases)
>
> > The old cluster size is 1GB
>
> > du -chs /var/lib/postgresql/9.1/main/
> > 1.1G
>
> > now I run a pg_upgrade to 9.2 with hard link mode,
>
> > pg_upgrade  --link \
> >     --old-datadir=/var/lib/postgresql/9.1/main \
> >     --new-datadir=/var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main \
> >     --old-bindir=/usr/lib/postgresql/9.1/bin \
> >     --new-bindir=/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin
>
> > du -chs /var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main/
> > 880M
>
> > Is the expected behaviour? I can't double the space in production.
>
> I don't think anybody actually answered your original question.
> The above doesn't represent a doubling of disk space, it just shows that
> "du" only tells you how much file space is linked into the directory
> tree you ask it about.  That is, there's lots of overlap between the
> first and second du results.  If you try "du" passing it both directory
> trees together, it should give you a number for the total space
> consumption that's not much more than 1.1G.  (Depending on which version
> of "du" you're using, you may need to give it an additional switch to
> tell it not to double-count multiply-linked files.)
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>

Reply via email to