Thanks Tom, I am happy with a 10K feet level discussion of the approach, and your response is just what I was looking for.
Regards Seref On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Seref Arikan <serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com> writes: > > I've just noticed that some parts of the autogenerated queries can be > > functions on their own. Would moving these parts to their own functions > > help the query planner? > > It's difficult to answer that without a lot more detail than you've > provided, but my offhand guess would be "no". Usually it's better > when the planner can expand functions inline, which would just be > reversing the transformation you're thinking of. > > regards, tom lane >
