Well, I did it:
explain (analyze, buffers)
select count(*) from turma.aula_confirmacao where
inicio_aula::DATE BETWEEN DATE_TRUNC('YEAR', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) AND
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; -- changed name because of a conflict in some queries
http://explain.depesz.com/s/Fzr
And just to update, this is the actual query and plan:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT
aluno_mensal.id_matricula,
aluno_mensal.id_turma,
aluno_mensal.turma,
aluno_mensal.id_produto_educacao,
aluno_mensal.produto_educacao,
aluno_mensal.unidade,
aluno_mensal.unidade_execucao,
aluno_mensal.modalidade,
aluno_mensal.id_pessoa,
aluno_mensal.nome_pessoa,
presenca.id_diario,
aula_confirmacao.inicio_aula::date AS data_aula,
presenca.justificativa_falta,
SUM(aula_confirmacao.termino_aula - aula_confirmacao.inicio_aula) AS
carga_faltas,
mensal.ano AS ano_apuracao,
mensal.mes AS mes_apuracao
FROM indicadores.aluno_mensal
JOIN indicadores.mensal
ON mensal.id_mensal = aluno_mensal.id_mensal
JOIN turma.presenca
ON presenca.id_matricula = aluno_mensal.id_matricula
JOIN turma.aula_confirmacao
ON aula_confirmacao.id_evento = presenca.id_evento
JOIN turma.estudante_periodo
ON
estudante_periodo.id_matricula = presenca.id_matricula AND
estudante_periodo.id_diario = presenca.id_diario AND
aula_confirmacao.inicio_aula::date BETWEEN estudante_periodo.inicio AND
estudante_periodo.termino
WHERE
presenca.inicio_aula::DATE BETWEEN DATE_TRUNC('YEAR', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)
AND CURRENT_TIMESTAMP AND
NOT presenca.presente AND
mensal.ano = EXTRACT(YEAR FROM CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) AND
aula_confirmacao.inicio_aula::DATE BETWEEN DATE_TRUNC('YEAR',
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) AND CURRENT_TIMESTAMP AND
aula_confirmacao.confirmada AND
aluno_mensal.id_medicao = 7
GROUP BY
aluno_mensal.id_matricula,
aluno_mensal.id_turma,
aluno_mensal.turma,
aluno_mensal.id_produto_educacao,
aluno_mensal.produto_educacao,
aluno_mensal.unidade,
aluno_mensal.unidade_execucao,
aluno_mensal.modalidade,
aluno_mensal.id_pessoa,
aluno_mensal.nome_pessoa,
presenca.id_diario,
aula_confirmacao.inicio_aula::date,
presenca.justificativa_falta,
mensal.ano,
mensal.mes;
http://explain.depesz.com/s/YfXr
I guess that, there is something with estudante_periodo, because there is
24% with only one row and 50% with 5 or less rows on it:
with distr as (select id_matricula, count(*) from turma.estudante_periodo
group by id_matricula)
select count as rows_on_estudante_periodo, count(*), (100 * count(*) /
sum(count(*)) over ())::numeric(5,2) as percent from distr group by count
order by 1;
rows_on_estudante_periodo | count | percent
---------------------------+-------+---------
1 | 24941 | 23.92
2 | 5720 | 5.49
3 | 5220 | 5.01
4 | 8787 | 8.43
5 | 7908 | 7.58
6 | 7357 | 7.06
7 | 4896 | 4.70
8 | 3076 | 2.95
9 | 2963 | 2.84
10 | 2679 | 2.57
11 | 6613 | 6.34
12 | 8708 | 8.35
13 | 4448 | 4.27
14 | 1411 | 1.35
15 | 2137 | 2.05
16 | 1219 | 1.17
17 | 2269 | 2.18
18 | 627 | 0.60
19 | 332 | 0.32
20 | 325 | 0.31
21 | 213 | 0.20
22 | 127 | 0.12
23 | 113 | 0.11
24 | 144 | 0.14
25 | 862 | 0.83
26 | 784 | 0.75
27 | 131 | 0.13
28 | 79 | 0.08
29 | 35 | 0.03
30 | 136 | 0.13
31 | 1 | 0.00
33 | 1 | 0.00
36 | 1 | 0.00
38 | 1 | 0.00
39 | 1 | 0.00
40 | 1 | 0.00
(36 rows)
After the refactoring, idx_aula_confirmacao_2 became idx_aula_confirmacao_1:
select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'idx_aula_confirmacao_1';
-[ RECORD 1
]----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
schemaname | turma
tablename | idx_aula_confirmacao_1
attname | inicio_aula
inherited | f
null_frac | 0.996792
avg_width | 4
n_distinct | 24
most_common_vals |
most_common_freqs |
histogram_bounds |
{2013-02-04,2013-02-25,2013-03-12,2013-03-15,2013-03-19,2013-03-21,2013-03-22,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25}
correlation | 0.433041
most_common_elems |
most_common_elem_freqs |
elem_count_histogram |
I've run:
analyze turma.aula_confirmacao ;
select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'idx_aula_confirmacao_1';
-[ RECORD 1
]----------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
schemaname | turma
tablename | idx_aula_confirmacao_1
attname | inicio_aula
inherited | f
null_frac | 0.996927
avg_width | 4
n_distinct | 24
most_common_vals |
most_common_freqs |
histogram_bounds |
{2013-02-04,2013-03-04,2013-03-08,2013-03-11,2013-03-13,2013-03-18,2013-03-20,2013-03-22,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25}
correlation | 0.208954
most_common_elems |
most_common_elem_freqs |
elem_count_histogram |
and a third time:
analyze turma.aula_confirmacao ;
select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'idx_aula_confirmacao_1';
-[ RECORD 1
]----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
schemaname | turma
tablename | idx_aula_confirmacao_1
attname | inicio_aula
inherited | f
null_frac | 0.997112
avg_width | 4
n_distinct | 17
most_common_vals |
most_common_freqs |
histogram_bounds |
{2013-02-13,2013-03-11,2013-03-15,2013-03-21,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25,2013-03-25}
correlation | 0.459312
most_common_elems |
most_common_elem_freqs |
elem_count_histogram |
Thanks,
2013/3/21 Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Cristian Cruz <
> danielcrist...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Are you using autovacuum? If so, you probably need to tune it more
>>> aggressively. For the short term, running an ANALYSE on those tables should
>>> at least get you more accurate query plans.
>>>
>>
>> I've done it; with default_statistics_target on 1000, 100 and 200 (left
>> it on 200, which was production config too).
>>
>
> You are doing an manual analyze each time you change
> default_statistics_target, right?
>
> Can you do an "analyze verbose aula_confirmacao" and see if the output is
> as expected?
>
> what happens if you do:
>
> explain (analyze, buffers)
> select count(*) from aula_confirmacao where
> inicio::DATE BETWEEN DATE_TRUNC('YEAR', CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) AND
> CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
>
> From your explain plan http://explain.depesz.com/s/GDJn, step 9, the row
> estimates for that simple query should be off by a factor of
> 23 (101508/4442), yet there is no apparent reason for that to give a bad
> estimate, other than bad statistics. There are no filters so cross-column
> correlations can't be throwing it off, so why is it so bad?
>
> Also, it would be nice to see:
>
> select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'idx_aula_confirmacao_2' \x\g\x
>
> (which I assume is a function-based index)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
--
Daniel Cristian Cruz
クルズ クリスチアン ダニエル
