On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote: > On 2013-02-06, Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >>> You've hidden nothing from INSERT-RETURNING. >> >> ?? Or from a select, if the final value is what you mean. What we hide >> is the way values are made, clearly not the final value. That bit is >> accessible to anyone who can select the table, obviously. >> > > so the trigger function is opaque, written in C or some other language > where they can't access the source easily?
I still don't see how that's any better than a stored procedure that directly does the INSERT. You can conceal the code every bit as easily. ChrisA -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
