Tianyin Xu wrote: > Ok, I agree that "2147483647" is not a reasonable setting. But what's the > definition of "reasonable"? I just want to study the impact of the setting > so I test the big number first.
Please don't top-post. Those values are not wrong. They just don't match what our current testing framework expects. Whether the generated plans are sensible or not is entirely another question; the queries should still return the same resultsets. Ordering of tuples within the resultset shouldn't matter, but the test framework is not smart enough to compare them that way. > When you give users the flexibility of configurations, you cannot say all > the values mismatching with your expectations are not allowed. In fact the > system allowed such settings. Sure. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
