On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Moshe Jacobson <mo...@neadwerx.com> wrote: > Is there any practical difference between defining a column as a varchar(n) > vs. a varchar vs. a text field?
not much. varchar(n) only forces the length to be <= n. I dislike inventing an 'n' when one is not known, but a lot of people do it. > I've always been under the impression that if I am wanting to index a > varchar column, it is better to set a maximum length. Is this correct? > But more importantly, what's the practical difference between varchar with > no limit and text? That is pretty much true. Index entries for a column in a btree are constrained to a be of a size of slightly less than page size. But this is true if you set the length or not. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
