On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Voras <ivo...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On the other hand, if the temp table can be completely ditched for a > > session variable or two, then yeah, that would be much better since > > you'd avoid the overhead of creating the table completely. > > Yes, this is what I was aiming at, based on the OP mentioning he only > has a limited amount of data to manage in this way. > Yup, I'm going to see how this goes using session variables. I think it is exactly what I need. Thanks! -- Moshe Jacobson Nead Werx, Inc. | Senior Systems Engineer 2323 Cumberland Parkway, Suite 201 | Atlanta, GA 30339 mo...@neadwerx.com | www.neadwerx.com
