Ben Chobot <be...@silentmedia.com> writes:
> 4. What might cause autovacuum analyze to make an index perform worse
> immediately, when a manual vacuum analyze does not have the same affect? And
> I'm not talking about changing things so the planner doesn't use the index,
> but rather, having the index actually take longer.
Dunno about the replication angle, but would this have been a GIN index?
I'm wondering about possible interference with flushing of its
pending-insert queue (the FASTUPDATE stuff).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
