From: Alexander Gataric [mailto:gata...@usa.net] 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:52 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Best free tool for relationship extraction

I need to determine relationships between several tables. Is there a free tool 
to extract these from catalog tables? Is there an SQL that also does this?

Thanks
Alex


Try this SQL:

WITH RECURSIVE FK_recursive(distance, child_table, parent_table, 
FK_constraint_name, unique_constraint_name,
                                      ON_DELETE, ON_UPDATE, is_deferrable, 
FK_path) AS (
    SELECT 1, tc.table_name, ctu.table_name, ctu.constraint_name, 
rc.unique_constraint_name,
           rc.delete_rule, rc.update_rule, tc.is_deferrable, 
quote_ident(ctu.table_name)
    FROM information_schema.constraint_table_usage ctu, 
information_schema.table_constraints tc, 
information_schema.referential_constraints rc
    WHERE ctu.table_name = 'gp_part_space' and ctu.table_catalog = 'vector'
      and tc.constraint_name = ctu.constraint_name and tc.constraint_type = 
'FOREIGN KEY' and tc.constraint_catalog = 'vector'
      and ctu.constraint_name = rc.constraint_name
  UNION ALL
    SELECT er.distance + 1, tc.table_name, ctu.table_name, ctu.constraint_name, 
rc.unique_constraint_name, 
           rc.delete_rule, rc.update_rule, tc.is_deferrable, er.FK_path || ' <- 
' || quote_ident(ctu.table_name)
    FROM FK_recursive er, information_schema.constraint_table_usage ctu, 
information_schema.table_constraints tc, 
information_schema.referential_constraints rc
    WHERE er.child_table = ctu.table_name and ctu.table_catalog = 'vector'
      and tc.constraint_name = ctu.constraint_name and tc.constraint_type = 
'FOREIGN KEY' and tc.constraint_catalog = 'vector'
      and ctu.constraint_name = rc.constraint_name
  )
SELECT distance, child_table, parent_table, FK_constraint_name, 
unique_constraint_name, 
       ON_DELETE, ON_UPDATE, is_deferrable, FK_path || ' <- ' || 
quote_ident(child_table) AS FK_path
  FROM FK_recursive ORDER BY distance, parent_table;

If you get an error like this (possible on 8.4.5):

ERROR:  operator is not unique: smallint[] <@ smallint[]
LINE 1: select $1 <@ $2 and $2 <@ $1
                  ^
HINT:  Could not choose a best candidate operator. You might need to add 
explicit type casts.
QUERY:  select $1 <@ $2 and $2 <@ $1
CONTEXT:  SQL function "_pg_keysequal" during inlining

Then recompile the function:

SET search_path TO information_schema;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION _pg_keysequal(smallint[], smallint[]) RETURNS boolean
    LANGUAGE sql IMMUTABLE
    AS 'select $1 operator(pg_catalog.<@) $2 and $2 operator(pg_catalog.<@) $1';
SET search_path TO public;


And then re-run original recursive query.

Regards,
Igor Neyman

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to