> > (what btw forced me to check it in plv8 - and it seems they use the same > approach internally in behind :( - though doesn't make sense because of > find_function works just with plv8 postgres functions)
Just realised I have called wrong method - so above is not true... it returns real v8 object, and methods of that object can be called :) Sorry, Misa 2012/9/5 Misa Simic <misa.si...@gmail.com> > Hi Joe, > > Do you maybe know, is it possible inside PL/R to call another PL/R > function - but take result as R object (whatever R function returns)? > > If we take this scenario for example (Take some data from DB, pivot them, > and save it as CSV)... pseudo code would be: > > -Execute SQL query > -pivot returned data > -save it to CSV... > > of course everything could be in one function, but I would organize my > code in much more... because of for example, if I need tomorrow get the > same thing and save it to PDF, or Save it to graph etc... I could > copy/paste the same function and change code in step 3... but if something > tomorrow should be changed in step 1 or 2 - I would need to make the same > change on 3 places... In pure R for example, I would have at least: > getPivotedData function and then SaveToCSV would call getPivotedData() and > save it in CSV, SaveToPdf would call the same getPivotedData() and save it > to PDF... etc, then tomorrow if something should be changed in first two > steps - I would change just getPivotedData function... and cover whole 3 > scenarios... > > Now, of course PostgreSQL function can't return R object, but plv8 has > solved that problem as plv8 Postgres Function returns record - what is an > v8 object... > > Then inside one plv8 function, we say > plv8.find_function("myv8FunctionWhatReturnsv8Object"), call it and takes > actuall result and do with that whatever need to be done inside v8 > environment... > > During I have written this mail - you have replied that actually my > question could be acomplished with serialise/deserialise... but I am not > sure I would take that approach - because of "methods" of an object would > be lost during serialize/deserialize... (what btw forced me to check it in > plv8 - and it seems they use the same approach internally in behind :( - > though doesn't make sense because of find_function works just with plv8 > postgres functions) > > > Thanks, > > Misa > > > > > 2012/9/4 Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> > >> On 09/04/2012 01:23 PM, Aram Fingal wrote: >> > So then, PL/R is not a solution to being able to pivot tables >> > directly in PostgreSQL but I might be able to define a PL/R procedure >> > which, for example, pivots tables and then uses the write.table() >> > function of R to send the results to disk without returning any rows >> > to PostgreSQL? Such a procedure might prove be faster and more >> > convenient than extracting the data from PostgreSQL into an R >> > application layer and then writing to disk. >> >> As mentioned somewhere else along this thread, I don't know that it will >> be faster, but it may well be more convenient if your goal is to get a >> CSV file in the end anyway. >> >> Joe >> >> >> -- >> Joe Conway >> credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us >> Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source >> Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >> > >