On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Mike Christensen <m...@kitchenpc.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> "McGehee, Robert" <robert.mcge...@geodecapital.com> writes: >>> One might even imagine a future version of PostgreSQL using an >>> efficient disk layout that may not match the table layout in order to >>> avoid wasted space from padding. >> >> Yeah, this has been discussed multiple times. The sticking point is >> the extra infrastructure needed to have a physical column numbering >> different from the user-visible numbering, and the 100% certainty of >> introducing a lot of bugs due to bits of code using one type of column >> number where they should have used the other. We'll probably get it >> done someday, but don't hold your breath ... > > Has there been any discussion of providing the ability to re-order > table columns through an ALTER TABLE command? I would love to see > this; when I add in a new column, I often want to put it next to > something just to be more visually appealing when I'm running ad-hoc > queries. It could potentially address this problem as well.
see: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Alter_column_position as well as extensive discussion in the archives. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
