Yep, that fixed it. Many thanks for the pointer.
From a performance point of view, I did look at using MOVE rather than
FETCH before I call UPDATE as I don't actually need to read the data
before applying the update. However in this situation, the ROW_COUNT is
always zero and can't be used which I suspect is reasonable.
Anyway, thanks for the help.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
