-- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
I like the current behavior. Having been pleasantly surprised that this is how
Pg operates, it is very helpful when I'm working on scripts or batches such as
for creating or populating schemas. If it dies part way through, I know I can
just fix the problem and rerun the whole thing, without having to first undo or
skip the earlier portions. Also, rollback for everything is much more
deterministic. -- Darren Duncan
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should ... Tom Lane
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Sho... Simon Riggs
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion... Chris Travers
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discus... Philip Couling
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discus... Rafal Pietrak
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discus... Greg Sabino Mullane
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should ... Rainer Pruy
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should ... Gavin Flower
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Sho... Rafal Pietrak
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should syntax errors... Greg Sabino Mullane
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should syntax errors... Darren Duncan
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should syntax errors... Edson Richter
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should syntax errors... Edson Richter
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should syntax e... Scott Marlowe
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should synt... Edson Richter
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Should ... Scott Marlowe
- Re: [GENERAL] Feature discussion: Sho... Edson Richter