Alberto Zanon <alberto.za...@edistar.com> writes:
> I agree with you about the concept of "port number". I only wanted to know if
> it is a new behavior of Postgresql 9.1.
More like 9.0, according to our commit logs:
Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Branch: master Release: REL9_0_BR [61be11ff0] 2009-09-27 03:43:10 +0000
Make libpq reject non-numeric and out-of-range port numbers with a suitable
error message, rather than blundering on and failing with something opaque.
Sam Mason
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
