[ sorry for slow response ] Stephen Rees <sr...@pandora.com> writes: > Code that works on Pg8.3 raises an error on Pg9.1, is this a bug?
Yes, it sure looks that way. Somebody decided they could mark userlocks
as transactional, which was probably a bad idea altogether, and
certainly wasn't followed up on adequately.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
