Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it> writes:
>> As you can see, the third time I get a NOTICE message I don't get the
>> first two times.
>> Everything works fine but this strange thing...
> There's a typo (extra create temporary view), Sorry,
Hm, yeah, the first time would throw an error because pg_temp doesn't
resolve, so if you're using DROP IF EXISTS there would be a visible
difference in behavior between the two cases.
I wonder if DROP IF EXISTS should consider non-existence of the
specified schema (if any) as being a "not exists" case, and not throw
an error for it. This isn't specific to the temp schema at all IMO.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
