Ok I just realized that's probably not going to be much help :)

  0.00      0.00     0.00        5     0.00     0.00  canonicalize_path
  0.00      0.00     0.00        5     0.00     0.00
 trim_trailing_separator
  0.00      0.00     0.00        3     0.00     0.00  strlcpy
  0.00      0.00     0.00        2     0.00     0.00  join_path_components
  0.00      0.00     0.00        2     0.00     0.00  last_dir_separator
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  find_my_exec
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  first_dir_separator
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  get_etc_path
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  get_progname
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  help
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  make_relative_path
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  resolve_symlinks
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  set_pglocale_pgservice
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  trim_directory
  0.00      0.00     0.00        1     0.00     0.00  validate_exec

That's the output of gprof pg_dump gmon.out  (I built the -pg build on my
dev box then ran it on the server.  I'm just running the actual dump on my
dev box against the server instead to see if I get something more useful
since that doesn't really seem to have much data in it)


On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Mike Roest <mike.ro...@replicon.com>wrote:

> Here's the gmon.out from a -pg compiled 9.1.1 pg_dump.
>
> --Mike
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Mike Roest <mike.ro...@replicon.com>wrote:
>
>> For sure I'll work on that now.  One thing I noticed looking through the
>> pg_dump code based on the messages and the code one thing I noticed it
>> seems to be grabbing the full dependency graph for the whole db rather then
>> limiting it by the schema (not sure if limiting this would be possible)
>>
>> This query returns 9843923 rows from the DB.  So processing this seems
>> like it'll take quite a while.
>>
>> I'll get a -pg build of pg_dump going here on a dev box so I can get you
>> a profile.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Roest <mike.ro...@replicon.com> writes:
>>> > This dump is currently taking around 8 minutes.  While dumping the
>>> pg_dump
>>> > process is using 100% of one core in the server (24 core machine).
>>>  Doing a
>>> > -v pg_dump I found that the following stages are taking the majority
>>> of the
>>> > time
>>>
>>> > reading user_defined tables (2 minutes and 20 seconds)
>>> > reading dependency data (5 minutes and 30 seconds)
>>>
>>> Can you get an execution profile with oprofile or gprof or similar tool?
>>> It doesn't surprise me a lot that pg_dump might have some issues with
>>> large numbers of objects, but guessing which inefficiencies are hurting
>>> you is difficult without more info.
>>>
>>>                        regards, tom lane
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to