Jeff Amiel <becauseimj...@yahoo.com> writes: >> At the moment I think the only way to work around this is >> to denormalize >> your schema a bit.
> And I feared as much. > It's biting me in other areas as well...this unusual distribution of > data...certain types of customers have completely different data patterns > than others. > Back to the drawing board...thanks! I find your table structure anyway somewhat strange. For an ordinary parent/child relationship a parent_id column in the customer table would be enough. Do you really have an m:n relationship between parents and children? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
