On Saturday, October 22, 2011 8:33:01 am stefan wrote: > > Thank you, Adrian for your response. > > I have checked your suggestion: in pg_pltemplate, tmpldbacreate is set > to true. As you state above, this allows a non superuser to create the > language in any database that does not yet has that language registered. > > However, due to the fact that in 9.0, the language is in template1 and > owned by postgres, a non superuser database owner will not have the > right to create or replace this language in any newly created database > owned by himself.
I misunderstood the intent of the above. I thought the language would acquire the ownership of the database creator. Some testing (should have done first) proved me wrong. > > Therefore the only solution I see is to drop plpgsql from template1, or > writing a wrapper script that exploits the -l and -L options of pg_restore. Yes. Though I could see an option to create a template database without plpgsql in it for use by non-superuser users and leave template1 as is. > > Cheers, > Stefan. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
