Greg Jaskiewicz <gryz...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 18 Oct 2011, at 20:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm.  The reason for that is that the table types aren't considered
>> dumpable objects.  I suppose we need to fix that, but in the meantime
>> you'd have better luck if you created the types as composite types
>> instead of implicit table rowtypes.

> Maybe worth adding to the TODO. 

If I hadn't done it yesterday, maybe so.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to