Shianmiin wrote: > > I thought the Atomic should be at statement level, could anyone tell me > why PostgreSQL behaves differently? >
re-state for clarification purpose. Since SQL is a set language, there is no concept of row order. I thought the checking should be on a per set operation (i.e. per statement), not per micro operation basis (e.g. in this case, the order of operations could result in success/failure). I don't know how strict the standard defines here and it could be implementation specific. Still wondering why PostgreSQL does it differently from other major DBMS? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Another-unexpected-behaviour-tp4610242p4612763.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
