Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
> max_connections = 100 # (change requires restart)
> # WARNING: If you're about to increase max_connections above 100, you
> # should probably be using a connection pool instead. See:
> # http://wiki.postgresql.org/max_connections
This gives the impression that performance is great at 100 and falls off
a cliff at 101, which is both incorrect and likely to lower peoples'
opinion of the software. I'd suggest wording more like "if you're
considering raising max_connections into the thousands, you should
probably use a connection pool instead". And I agree with Merlin that a
wiki pointer is inappropriate.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
