On 11.05.11 17:04, "t...@fuzzy.cz" <t...@fuzzy.cz> wrote: >We had exactly the same problem and persistent connection solved it.
First testing with persistent connections seems to work like a charm. Will do some thorough testing and watch the memory load. Hopefully, I will not trip over some sort of pitfall. Goole seems to be full of people who have problems with persistent connections. Big thanks for your advice. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
