On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Adrian Schreyer <ams...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > The largest arrays I expect at the moment are more or less sparse > vectors of around 4.8k elements and I have noticed that the > input/output (C/C++ extension) does not scale well with the number of > elements in the array. > > Using a function that sums all elements in the array, this is the time > it takes for ~150k arrays of various sizes (including ordering desc > and limit 10): > > 128: 61ms > 256: 80ms > 512: 681ms > 1024 1065ms > 2048 7682ms > 4096 21332ms
hm, I'm not following you exactly -- what sql are you running? This scales pretty well for me: select array_dims(array(select generate_series(1,1000000))); etc merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
