On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:28 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:09:25 am Rafael Martinez wrote:
> > Might want to take a look at: > [......] > sequence). If, due to a short-term peak of log output rate, there are > more than 3 * checkpoint_segments + 1 segment files, the unneeded > segment files will be deleted instead of recycled until the system > gets back under this limit." > Thank you. This explains the number of WAL files generated, I was not aware of the (3*checkpoint_segments + 1) limit (I will RTBM better next time) But this doesn't explain the WAL files not been created/recycled time-ordered. I wonder if this happened because the partition got full while the WALs were created/recycled? regards, -- Rafael Martinez Guerrero Center for Information Technology University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
