On 04/04/11 12:43, Annamalai Gurusami wrote: > What we are trying to achieve is that a single application can work as > an ordinary client or an embedded client.
That makes a lot of sense, and would be useful for testing too. > I have no clue as to why you have recommended BerkeleyDB in this > context! What I have described is pgsql and the applications all use > SQL queries. Yeah... I'd think that FireBird, SQLite or embedded MySQL would make a lot more sense than BDB. Personally, I suspect that anybody who suggests Berkeley DB for a job hasn't programmed with it! I can personally see some advantages in being able to use the same API for in-database and outside-database clients. The biggest issue, though, is transaction management. Until/unless Pg gains support for autonomous transactions, there are operations that can be performed in libpq that just don't make sense in an spi context. -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
