On 15 Feb 2011, at 16:20, Vick Khera wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Derrick Rice <derrick.r...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is the query optimizer capable of using the relationship between an index on >> date_trunc(foo) and a query with "where foo < bar and foo > baz" ? At this >> point the question is to satisfy my own curiosity.
> I also don't think that the storage space will be any less. A > timestamp is always stored in the same amount of space. All you're > doing is zeroing out the higher resolution bits of time. I suppose it would help to cast the column to date, both in the index creation and in the queries. I don't have time right now to verify that the storage space of a date is actually less than a timestamp, but I expect it would be (although, dates in PG have an awful lot of range!). Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. !DSPAM:737,4d5adbbf11734598963003! -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
