On 2010-12-06, Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> wrote: > * Tom Lane: > >> Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> writes: >>> The old 'escape' encoding used by PostgreSQL 8.4 and prior was pretty >>> helpful for getting human-readable strings in psql. It seems this >>> functionality was removed in PostgreSQL 9.0. Was this an accident or >>> a deliberate decision? Could we get it back, please? >> >> I think you're looking for "set bytea_output = escape".
> To me, this seems problematic as a general recommendation because > programs won't use this, programs should be using libpq's unescape_bytea and thus be immune to changes in the representation. If you want predictable representation base64 (or hex) your data and store it in a text column postgres will compress long values so not hardly any space will be wasted. > and it's confusing to have different output > in psql than what your program sees. That's why I don't want to put > it into .psqlrc. The separate command will raise a few eyebrows here > and there. 8-/ ALTER DATABASE whatever SET bytea_output = escape; or ALTER USER whoever SET bytea_output = escape; -- ⚂⚃ 100% natural -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
