"Reuven M. Lerner" <reu...@lerner.co.il> writes: > Hi, everyone. Alban wrote: >> Which version of pg_dump did you use? The one that came with the 9.0 install >> or the one from the old 8.3 one? It should have been the first of these two.
> The dump was done by someone using the old, existing system, which runs > under 8.3. Hmmm ... I wonder whether this is related to the known problem that 8.3's pg_dump doesn't correctly detect file seekability under Windows: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-06/msg01227.php That means the dump file will not contain any data offset pointers. Up to now that was only known to cause issues for parallel pg_restore, but maybe you found another case. But that's just a hypothesis, and a quick test here doesn't seem to support it: I can still do pg_restore -a from a blob-containing dump that I forced to not have data offsets. OTOH I'm not using Windows. Does it work any better if you use 9.0's pg_dump to dump from the 8.3 server? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
