If you want that level of isolation, you have to give each user his own
cluster.
as postgresql is currently structured, yes, and further, each cluster
needs its own listener port which is, IMHO, rather ugly.
The amount of work needed to get rid of that small bit of ugliness seems
far out of proportion to the value.
With the current architecture, you would need to develop service
management that could potentially handle 100s of clusters, in a shared
web host sort of environment. I sure wouldn't want to have to manage
100s of sysV /etc/rc3.d kinda services to launch all these postmasters,
ugh. As I'm envisioning it, the user management would be in the master
cluster, child cluster/instances would not have their own users.
yeah, I suppose this is pointless. ah well, after a couple beers last
night, it seemed like a fantastic idea :D
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
