sunpeng <blueva...@gmail.com> writes:
> First I use SPI_execute("update ....
> bool succ;
> SPI_connect();
> int ret = SPI_execute("update ....where uid = 1", false, 1);//later will
> add error processing
> if (ret == SPI_OK_UPDATE && SPI_processed == 1) {
> succ = true;
> }
> SPI_finish();
> Then I use SPI_execute("select .....where uid = 1", ....
> SPI_connect();
> int ret = SPI_execute("select .....where uid = 1", true, 1);//later will
> add error processing
> if (ret == SPI_OK_SELECT && SPI_processed == 1) {
> HeapTuple tuple;
> tuple = SPI_tuptable->vals[0];
> ...
> datum = heap_getattr(tuple,attrno,SPI_tuptable->tupdesc,&isnull);
> ....
> }
> the datum doesn't change, why ?
You're missing a CommandCounterIncrement() call between the two actions.
If you hadn't passed read_only = true to the second SPI_execute, it
would have done one for you.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
