Excerpts from Richard Huxton's message of mié sep 01 16:39:55 -0400 2010: > OK - so not fillfactor and not some unicode-related padding. I can't see > how a 32 vs 64-bit architecture change could produce anything like a > doubling of database size.
Depending on table schemas, why not? e.g. consider a table with a single bool column. It will waste 7 bytes on 8-byte MAXALIGN machine but only 3 on a 4-byte MAXALIGN machine. Of course, this is a corner case. Devrim didn't specify the platform on each server AFAICS. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
